This article discusses the basics of this popular drilling method when it comes to monitoring wells.
In the direct-mud rotary drilling method, the borehole is advanced by rapid
rotation of a drill bit mounted on the end of the drill rods. The bit cuts and
breaks the material at the bottom of the hole into small pieces (cuttings). The
cuttings are removed by pumping drilling fluid (water or water mixed with a
fluid enhancer, such as bentonite) down through the drill rods and bit and up
the annulus between the borehole and the drill rods. The drilling fluid also
serves to cool the drill bit and stabilize the borehole wall, to prevent the
flow of fluids between the borehole and surrounding earth materials, and to
reduce cross-contamination between aquifers.
Direct-mud rotary drilling offers a number of advantages. It is a very fast and
efficient means of drilling. Efficient rigs can produce several thousand feet
of hole per day. The direct-mud rotary method can reach to several thousand
feet in depth and create hole diameters greater than 48 inches. The method is
adaptable to a wide range of geologic conditions. Only exceptionally large,
poorly stabilized boulders or karst (cavernous) conditions are unsuited for
direct-mud rotary drilling.
Sediment sampling is broadly supported in direct-mud rotary drilling. Standard
split-barrel and thin-wall sampling are available in poorly lithified
materials, while a broad range of coring equipment is supported for
consolidated rock. Hydrologic conditions have little effect on direct-mud
rotary drilling; operations usually are unhindered by the presence of ground
water. Direct-mud rotary drilling readily supports the telescoping of casings
to successively smaller sizes to isolate drilled intervals and to protect lower
geologic units from contamination by previously drilled, contaminated upper
sediments.
Direct-mud rotary drilling has some inherent disadvantages for monitoring well
installation. If the drilling mud is not carefully engineered, drilling fluids
may invade permeable zones, compromising the validity of subsequent monitoring
well samples from those intervals. The mud cake necessary to hole stability
usually will interfere to some extent – by ionic exchange – with the analysis
of monitoring well water samples. Organic compounds that commonly are added to
drilling fluids also may interfere with chemical and physical tests on sediment
samples. Poorly engineered drilling fluids may produce difficult-to-remove mud
cakes that inhibit the flow of fluids to the well. Relatively large volumes of
cuttings and drilling fluids may provide containment problems, and must be
disposed of properly.
At sites being monitored for hydrocarbons, inherently complex rotary rigs may
introduce grease and oil to the monitoring system. Mud pumps, water swivels,
rotary drives, rod connections and drilling fluid components all may contribute
hydrocarbons inadvertently to the system, despite the best
decontamination/degreasing efforts. When water or other materials are introduced
to the drill hole, those materials must be sampled and analyzed as control
samples.
Despite these obstacles, direct-mud rotary drilling can be the best
alternative, especially for deep wells or wells completed into well-lithified
rocks. When direct-mud rotary methods are used, hole diameters should be 3
inches to 5 inches larger than the outer diameter of the well casings to allow
effective placement of filter and sealing materials. Two-inch diameter
monitoring wells should, therefore, be installed within 5.5-inch or larger
holes.
This article is provided through the courtesy of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency’s Environmental Response Team.
Direct-Mud Rotary Drilling
Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!